logoalt Hacker News

generjtoday at 3:21 PM7 repliesview on HN

Some of the collection is creepy, and I’ve largely stopped using mobile apps and loyalty programs myself. However, some of the concern seems very misplaced.

“Oh no McDonald’s runs a Customer Lifetime Value algorithm, a thing in use for decades and which has minimal privacy implications.”

“GASP the Golden Arches knows I like Diet Coke and has applied a marketing segmentation to me!”

Congrats, you’ve discovered they use concepts taught in Marketing 101?


Replies

Grombobuloustoday at 3:30 PM

Yeah, it’s 500+ pages, where is the surprising stuff? I assume the author of the piece would have chosen to list out the most egregious/shocking data out of the document, right?

I don’t think any of this is non-surprising in the “we’ve been conditioned to think this is normal” kind of way. This is really just a basic transaction history with extremely basic non-AI analytics applied.

The length of the document sounds scary but it also seems like it’s essentially a transaction list.

I would have thought the article might get into more details like location tracking like being able to predict where that person would be at a certain time, or maybe details inferred from data like “this person buys McFlurries when they’re on their period.”

Something scarier would be figuring our friend and family relationships, where relatives and friends live, etc.

I’m sure that could be done with data like this, and it’s critical that companies like McDonald’s keep that data secure and delete it when they don’t need it. We should have better laws in that regard.

At some point McDonald’s doesn’t really care about all that extra creepy stuff. Anything beyond figuring out your buying preferences is not useful information to them. The biggest concern would be that they would be willing to sell that data to someone else who is interested.

mainmailmantoday at 3:33 PM

That’s where I’m at. I really don’t care if an individual business collects usage data like this. I have a problem when that data is used outside of that context.

Try to sell me more burgers and fries? Fine, but don’t tell my doctor, or palantir, or the government etc etc. I don’t believe that’s a huge ask as a consumer in the Information Age.

show 1 reply
BeetleBtoday at 4:18 PM

Yeah I kept reading the article and thinking ... "This seems reasonable." "This seems fine."

It also wasn't clear how much of the data they have is because he's using the app. If it is, it seems much/most of the data was in his control.

Do they think McDonalds (or whichever company) is going to spend a lot of money building an app and a rewards program and not expect an ROI on it?

show 1 reply
williamdclttoday at 3:33 PM

the vast majority of people have not taken Marketing 101, and it'd be strange to expect them to have. I know you're not literally talking about a Marketing 101 course, but the point is the same

show 1 reply
yescotoday at 3:51 PM

Yeah I walked into this with my pitchfork ready but isn't this stuff pretty... reasonable?

McDonalds is just a restaurant, they predict what menu items you like and how likely you will come back, is that really a problem? What is the concern here? I don't use their app but presumably for those that do, isn't this exactly the type of data that would simply influence whether the app offers a coupon or something? Or how well a franchise is doing? Maybe also what to keep on the menu or how much to stock?

What exactly is the bar here I wonder? McDonalds has security cameras, it also has menu kiosks with cameras (I think?). The alternate reality evil tech-like McDonalds could have theoretically used facial recognition to categorize all footage of any given customer, then used this footage to estimate their friends, spouse, BMI, age, gender, ethnic group, attractivness, disability, etc. They could then sell it to third party data brokers for extra cash.

That would certainly be the kind of dystopian surveillance to get me swinging my pitchfork around, but this? Having assumed the worst I'm now walking away realizing McDonalds might not be so bad after all.

juicelandtoday at 3:32 PM

If the concern is misplaced, where should it be placed?

show 2 replies
AlexandrBtoday at 3:35 PM

What people think of these programs is often linked to the perception of the product being sold. If a cigarette company did this, people would be pissed. McDonalds is kind of an edge case - everyone knows it's not great for you, but it's not as harmful as cigarettes or drinking so you get mixed takes.

The classic case here is Target inferring that someone was pregnant before her family did[1] - so yeah, this is nothing new.

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/how-targ...

show 2 replies