logoalt Hacker News

angeldimitrov94today at 1:40 AM2 repliesview on HN

It sure would be interesting if suddenly all of the Flock employees coming to work were being constantly watched by a network of crowdfunded private cameras. Might drive home the point of invasion of privacy if its someone other than them watching...them. Or if all of the neighbors of the CEO of Flock suddenly joined some service like this so that everyone could track his activity at all times. I'm sure he'd wouldn't mind the entire world knowing exactly what he or his family are doing always.


Replies

Teevertoday at 3:11 AM

The term you're looking for is sousveillance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sousveillance

It's a very important tool to figure out which people in positions of authority are coordinating for authoritarian purposes or just plain old corruption.

I'm instantly suspicious of anyone in government who is critical of this idea.

What are they hiding?

show 1 reply
dylan604today at 2:17 AM

How would the video captured from those cameras be used? These people are already driving on the same streets you and I do, so how would they not also be in the Flock footage? If you capture TBs of video footage and nobody sees it, what's the point? Are you going to start sending harassing posts to employees with footage of the car driving by your camera?

The anti-flock movement is real, but half baked ideas don't really serve a purpose to actually doing anything. Not sure how I feel about those destroying Flock cameras, but that's action moving the needle a lot further than establishing an entirely new anti-Flock camera network.

show 3 replies