logoalt Hacker News

z4y5f3today at 8:12 AM8 repliesview on HN

Apparently they are scanning OSS and popular software at scale and disclosing the vulnerabilities they found: https://cvd.z.ai/

Most of these are under embargo, but it seems there are a lot of CVE here from a wide range of popular software, many considered critical or high.

I understand the argument of "people are not actively looking", but isn't the cost for such a scan getting lower by the week, and Anthropic's Project Glasswing is supposed to find them quite a while ago?


Replies

SyneRydertoday at 8:39 AM

> ... Anthropic's Project Glasswing is supposed to find them quite a while ago?

That was my thought too. For all of Anthropic's talk about their "adversaries", it seems Z.AI have been quietly offering fixes for single shot Remote Code Execution flaws in US software (Safari / WebKit) that Apple and Glasswing / Mythos missed, and that Apple would not attribute to GLM.

show 4 replies
fsndztoday at 11:47 AM

this is impressive and actually matches my expectations in terms of near term AI progress. we are going to continue to seem impressive progress in coding & related, anything where verifiability is scalable in an automated way: https://transitions.substack.com/p/a-quantum-of-ai-progress?...

rbehrendstoday at 11:28 AM

> I understand the argument of "people are not actively looking", but isn't the cost for such a scan getting lower by the week, and Anthropic's Project Glasswing is supposed to find them quite a while ago?

You have to consider that having an LLM scan for vulnerabilities is hardly infallible. It is a search guided by heuristics and given a large enough codebase, it is unlikely to identify all vulnerabilities.

Personally, I've had Fable 5, GPT 5.6 Sol, and GLM 5.2 all looking for correctness issues in an old abandoned WIP codebase of mine and all of them found some that the others hadn't discovered. Now, correctness issues aren't the same as vulnerabilities, but the same principle about using heuristics to find defects applies.

dgellowtoday at 10:37 AM

> and Anthropic's Project Glasswing is supposed to find them quite a while ago?

We cannot trust a single company to report security issues, it’s good to see competition in that domain

show 1 reply
mcintyre1994today at 11:11 AM

If you look at the distribution of their findings in the linked post, most of theirs are issues introduced a long time ago, almost all before 2006.

Complete speculation, but I wonder if they and Anthropic are scanning very different codebases and Anthropic's skew would be in the other direction.

ThouYStoday at 9:57 AM

amazing! huge clusters in code from the 1980s haha

sscaryterrytoday at 9:01 AM

Interesting... So Chinese models are not so bad?

show 3 replies
re-thctoday at 8:54 AM

> Anthropic's Project Glasswing is supposed to find them quite a while ago?

Someone still has to run it. The analysis and fix could be someone's machine but not committed / published.