logoalt Hacker News

cityofdelusionyesterday at 4:08 PM4 repliesview on HN

Not really. Private health insurance would still exist alongside for the more wealthy (including nearly everyone on HN) that doesn’t want to wait a year for their public system MRI. Same thing that plays out in other countries. The U.S. already has a form of this in so-called concierge / premium providers too. Lots of profit to be made.


Replies

intuitionistyesterday at 4:12 PM

This isn’t true of the Medicare for All Act, for what it’s worth. That would ban private insurance altogether. Personally I think that’s a bug, not a feature, but if you’re very concerned with fairness then you probably think the opposite.

kennywinkeryesterday at 4:25 PM

Having the machine capacity to get non-urgent MRIs in hours is part of why US healthcare is so expensive. Anyway, the average (again for non-urgent MRIs) where I live in canada is 9 weeks, which is i am sure skewed due to the rural population. In the city it’s like half that.

show 1 reply
loegyesterday at 4:14 PM

If private health insurance was allowed, UHC would be stillborn. It only works if providers don't have better options than medicare reimbursement rates.

show 2 replies