not a bad assessment in the end though it doesn't entirely read as it ends. basically: openAI is growing up moving towards IPO and cancelling stuff they were tring out with and things that don't have an obvious benefit for enterprise customers.

on the flipside i do think if there is an entire team to assess critical risk, that the model during testing hacking some company is either: 1) really terrible assessments 2) team was 100% ignored already and basically just for show

most likely its 2, not the fault of the team members, but mismanagement which has now been resolved. Made the team but didn't want to produce the outputs, maybe because people were fearmongering and they hired a few poor souls to counter-market that they were doing good on the safety front.

A bit cruel to hire people for such things but i suppose its the AI-flavor of a diversity hire -_-