alt Hacker NewsSure, you can argue that its a bad deal, shouldn't be allowed period, etc. But that is a different argument than saying that there is no scrutiny.
Replies
girvo • today at 1:44 PM
The argument is that the scrutiny is in practice not sufficient, as usual in these cases.
➕ show 1 reply
goalieca • today at 1:53 PM
Insufficient scrutiny would be more apt.
Sounds like a case of “there’s not enough scrutiny unless the decision ends up agreeing with my position”