What words did I seemingly misunderstand or misuse? I'll wait. Where does the dictionary come into this discussion?
> It is the unknown human peace-makers who have made it possible for you to sit in your chair and type such hate spew.
Is DARPA full of "human peace-makers?" Is calling someone a "warrior narcissist" not "hate spew?" Genuinely curious here how you split this.
> I'd do it to make one less murder weapon in the world
Why would someone who has weapons let you? What power do you have specifically? Remember: you can't use violence (and I'd argue that extends to basically every means of sanctions - including your "shunning" garbage.)
> Did you carve that billet for profit - did it feed you?
Yes. Now what?
> Because de-weaponization is more important than your identity.
OK but how does that involve AR-15s and AK-47s? Why do I need to take a manufactured object and somehow Rube Goldberg it into something else instead of just melting it down? And at that point, the raw resources should've just been used for that purpose and there's no point in mentioning rifles.
> Because it is there
Again with it is "there." No, it is not "there." Does it just operate itself for free?
> hey learn each others language!
Ok: what happens when two nations speak the same language but declare war? Does war just magically go away because of linguists? Why the fuck does spoken language in 2026 have anything to do with political ideals here? LLMs exist, Google Translate has existed for decades: clearly this arbitrary "speak the language" nonsense is not helping.
> Your identity is not worth more than life.
I'm not going to stop, now what? What are you going to do?
alt Hacker News
> Do you not know how to use a dictionary, human?
What words did I seemingly misunderstand or misuse? I'll wait. Where does the dictionary come into this discussion?
> It is the unknown human peace-makers who have made it possible for you to sit in your chair and type such hate spew.
Is DARPA full of "human peace-makers?" Is calling someone a "warrior narcissist" not "hate spew?" Genuinely curious here how you split this.
> I'd do it to make one less murder weapon in the world
Why would someone who has weapons let you? What power do you have specifically? Remember: you can't use violence (and I'd argue that extends to basically every means of sanctions - including your "shunning" garbage.)
> Did you carve that billet for profit - did it feed you?
Yes. Now what?
> Because de-weaponization is more important than your identity.
OK but how does that involve AR-15s and AK-47s? Why do I need to take a manufactured object and somehow Rube Goldberg it into something else instead of just melting it down? And at that point, the raw resources should've just been used for that purpose and there's no point in mentioning rifles.
> Because it is there
Again with it is "there." No, it is not "there." Does it just operate itself for free?
> hey learn each others language!
Ok: what happens when two nations speak the same language but declare war? Does war just magically go away because of linguists? Why the fuck does spoken language in 2026 have anything to do with political ideals here? LLMs exist, Google Translate has existed for decades: clearly this arbitrary "speak the language" nonsense is not helping.
> Your identity is not worth more than life.
I'm not going to stop, now what? What are you going to do?