You could probably score 100% on ARC 3 if you were motivated enough. I find some of the current problems to be kind of like Chess - mechanically simple, and ~solvable, but it's difficult to force myself to think at length about a monotonous and meaningless problem. The machines do have an advantage on the "energy" front; they've become almost psychotically persistent (and don't get tired after too many prompts).

Anyway yes I think we've had AGI for a while now, even if the GI doesn't quite match up with what we expect from a human.

You'll find that those goalposts are very movable.

> Is this AGI? I don't think I can score 100% on ARC AGI.

100% is some "RHAE" metric: its performance of median human first time seeing those problem.

>A 100% score means AI agents can beat every game as efficiently as humans. (0)

Yey, AGI is finally solved.

(0) https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3

It is until ARC-AGI-4. Maybe around 73 we will stop.

Yes, we’ve had AGI for years now.

Depends on which definition they’ll use today.

What's AGI, at the end of the day? Equivalence to the average human?

agi with a context of 250k-1mill tokens?

Could KITT? Cmdr. Data?

[dead]