logoalt Hacker News

ImPostingOnHNtoday at 2:27 PM5 repliesview on HN

You're right, but I'd personally be okay with the paywalled article search results not showing up, since they are ads masquerading as usable search results.

If the publisher wants me to subscribe (and many do publish content worth paying for), they can reach me via normal means, versus corrupting my search results.


Replies

u554uu5utoday at 4:26 PM

they are reaching out out via normal means. you don't get to redefine words because you are too cheap to pay for information and only read trash. its so funny how you idiots gibble about "if you do not pay you are the product" but everything you know about the world is you being the product

cosmic_cheesetoday at 2:57 PM

Right. I don’t mind paying when the value is clear and I feel like my time has been respected, and paywalled link showing up in search violates the second of those two.

In most of the circumstances when those show up in my search I’m looking for information for immediate use and I am not going whip out a credit card. If I run into a paywall, I’m immediately hitting the back button and moving on to the next result, so it’s better if they just never show up in search at all.

show 1 reply
raframtoday at 3:07 PM

By this logic, listings for physical products shouldn't show in search results either, because they're just ads for something you have to pay for.

You aren't entitled to others' work for free, and sometimes the most relevant result for your search is something paid.

This is a particularly tone-deaf line of reasoning on Hacker News, IMO, because the tech industry is (a) so, so much better paid than journalism, for work that is easier, and (b) largely responsible for the death of journalism as a sustainable business.

show 2 replies
no-name-heretoday at 2:52 PM

Is the idea that you strongly prefer seeing ads instead of paywalls?

show 1 reply