logoalt Hacker News

detourdogtoday at 3:19 PM4 repliesview on HN

This recent phenomenon is interesting to me because a jury of peers is standing up for individuals against corporate/government overreach.


Replies

gorgoilertoday at 3:35 PM

Do we know that to be the case? This could just as likely be an incompetent prosecutor showing up with inadequate or invalidated evidence and the jury throwing the case out on grounds of procedural incompetence rather than sympathy.

show 3 replies
abirchtoday at 5:32 PM

This is why it's important for us to show up and do jury duty even if it's not sexy. You can make a difference.

wang_litoday at 3:36 PM

Not real recent. Nullification like this goes far back. It just requires a certain level of bias across the jury pool. After which, some people or companies will be unable to be protected by criminal law.

show 1 reply
alphazardtoday at 3:29 PM

Not sure why your comment is being downvote. That is in fact the best explanation for what is going on here, and the outcome has little to do with the competence of the prosecutor, as is perhaps alluded to by the original comment.

It's good to see individuals on a jury acting according to rational self-interest.