> This is a social contract
What's the other side of the contract? Why would a reader oblige to corrupt?
Kind of like how human memory works, if I understand correctly.
Should have patented it and licensed it to Snap
I thought something like this should be part of the file system to make it even more laborious to by pass
Seems like there is no mechanism to allow non-corrupting reads from authorized processes? Begs the question then of what the point of this is. Pure novelty, or truly something that could be used in practice?