logoalt Hacker News

IncreasePostsyesterday at 7:09 PM3 repliesview on HN

What I don't understand is if he just didn't give any password, he would have been fine. It's only because he gave him a duress pin that he's in trouble.

So, in both cases the government wouldn't have access to the contents of the phone


Replies

frollogastonyesterday at 10:33 PM

They might have a way to gain access anyway. That was that case where the FBI got the locked iPhone 5C of a San Bernardino shooter suspect. Apple refused to unlock it, so the FBI paid a hacking firm to do it. If there's no known vuln to get into a phone today, I wonder if they'd hold onto it in hopes that one shows up later.

twothreeoneyesterday at 7:15 PM

In the first case they (the US govmnt) could hold him (the citizen) in contempt (in a cell) indefinitely.

show 2 replies
blkhp19yesterday at 7:17 PM

Is that allowed? Can you refuse to give a pin when asked?

show 2 replies