logoalt Hacker News

nik282000yesterday at 11:56 PM1 replyview on HN

Ah yes, if he was innocent he would have nothing to hide.

Would you care to post screenshots of your inboxes and browser history for the class?


Replies

zuzululutoday at 12:01 AM

99% of ppl would not hesitate than risk detainment

> Would you care to post screenshots of your inboxes and browser history for the class?

i would be since i dont have anything to hide, do you have anything to hide or find embarassing ? I don't maybe my credit score, a few porn sites and password resets to some dating sites. I don't really care if authorities see it because there's nothing remotely illegal involved.

Mr. Tunick does seem like had illegal activities to hide from the article it seems like he was part of some politically motivated group then to make it worse it seems like he folded under pressure and did reveal what he was hiding. This alone is the worst possible thing you either go all the way 1st amendment bare detention and hardship or jst use a non graphene device with nothing on it.

rn graphene is just asking to be detained just get a second device, you just look more guilty than necessary.

graphene is an excellent piece of software im just not convinced the people who are using it are aware of the heat it brings them.

also i can't help but suspect that anyone entering duress pin to wipe the device are innocent. if it was something embarrassing and nothing illegal theres no need to even install graphene.

i can't help but conclude people who are installing graphene are involved in illegal activities when i see the news

show 1 reply