logoalt Hacker News

toast0today at 8:13 AM3 repliesview on HN

At least the timing of the turns is predictable... I imagine working with countries with snap elections is harder, especially when they have trouble forming a government.


Replies

biorachtoday at 8:18 AM

You might think. The UK would be the most prominent example and in fact has been a much more predictable and consistent trading and negotiating partner than the USA

show 2 replies
epolanskitoday at 8:17 AM

No, why would that be?

That's the reality of most mature democracies from UK to Germany to Italy.

If anything, that makes change slower and based on coalition consensus, not a single winner-take-all individual mood.

Which means that there isn't much to "work" as previous arrangements keep holding and they hardly change.

I would never exchange our democracy for a king electing one like in US, Turkey or Russia.

I'd rather have our democracies slower, the governments more unstable, but representative.

show 1 reply
expedition32today at 10:12 AM

Countries realise that trade agreements are too important for politics.

They are usually negotiated by a nation's crack team of experts. America just does not take any of this seriously anymore.