This is patently false, see Tao’s recent use of ChatGPT regarding the Jacobian conjecture.
Kinda talking about pretty squishy things here, saying something is "patently false" in the context feels pretty stifling, or at least uncharitable.
Like, what, we are all supposed to close the book on this abstract, very new question. Something that by any approximation is extremely nuanced and also pretty meaningful? Like, "oh OK, well I guess that's that then!"
Depends on the context.
In this case he is right : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49239999