logoalt Hacker News

ghostly_stoday at 7:02 PM2 repliesview on HN

The existing solution is actively wreaking havoc on the environment. I don't know the specifics of this crop but generally agricultural products absorb a substantial amount of carbon when growing, so releasing some of that carbon by later burning has the potential to be close to carbon-neutral. Whilst petroleum fuels are 100% carbon negative.


Replies

VBprogrammertoday at 8:04 PM

Aviation is a relatively small amount of global carbon dioxide emissions (2.5% or so). However, there is some evidence that their emissions are much worse than they seem on paper due to NOx and water vapour emissions high in the troposphere. Even if coconut oil was a remotely viable alternative it would do nothing to address these other issues.

brainwadtoday at 7:23 PM

There's more to the environment than the greenhouse effect. Coconut plantations would compete with rainforest in much the same way palm oil ones do, since they have more or less identical growing climates.

If you want to use biofuels, use a plant that grows in low-value areas like open fields. Something like corn or sugarcane.

show 1 reply