logoalt Hacker News

JoshTriplettyesterday at 8:39 PM3 repliesview on HN

I remember using talk back when first learning Linux in college. I enjoyed the character-by-character aspect of it.


Replies

jghntoday at 1:32 AM

Until you wind up chatting with a painfully slow typist. Even worse is when they typo a lot and take the time to fix them on the fly

ButlerianJihadtoday at 3:03 AM

The default `talk` and talk service were trash, and often there were protocol errors that would cause you to hang forever, vainly waiting for an answer (classic talk used UDP only.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk_(software)

Eventually, a few competing offerings sprang up, in the form of `ntalk`, `xtalk` and `ytalk`. These were superior in every way, and sometimes required swapping out the service attached to inetd. Once you did that, it was a fantastic way to chat live and direct on Unix. Way better than the `write` we started with!

em500yesterday at 9:15 PM

Yes, I've wondered many times why there are no modern (human to human) chat interfaces that implements that, rather than sentence by sentence.

show 1 reply