logoalt Hacker News

enos_feedlertoday at 11:34 AM4 repliesview on HN

For this example, if you built a browser in 2000 it would put you in a great position to launch android in 2008. I think this is pg’s point. You spend all this time learning the interesting bits and when an inflection comes along that makes a new product or service possible you could be the one to likely launch it


Replies

serbuvladtoday at 1:32 PM

I am talking from the perspective of the individual developer.

You don't need your impressive product to succeed to land a good career.

If Alice is doing LLM-from-scratch work today, and Bob is doing agent harness work today, Bob's project is far more likely than Alice's to become useful/popular/profitable.

But if neither project survives, in 5 years, Alice will be more employable/at a higher market rate than Bob.

show 1 reply
paulryanrogerstoday at 12:19 PM

Each new bet will be expensive and depend less on technical merit than luck and having a backup so your family doesn't starve.

show 1 reply
chasd00today at 2:17 PM

That’s like saying if you can dunk in 8th grade you could be the next LeBron James. A LOT more things have to fall perfectly in place at the perfect time for that end result to materialize.

liberiantoday at 12:44 PM

This was his point. Being prepare to launch a produce when the opportunity comes.