logoalt Hacker News

diego_moitatoday at 1:34 PM1 replyview on HN

I am surprised that you even ask this question. Do you expect it to be different?

It is the oldest story in any kind of human community, from tribes to empires, from marriages to enterprises: they're ruled through is politics not justice.

Meritocracy and justice is just the order that we want the world to be, the ideal state. Its entropy and normal state is politics and this as nothing to do with justice.


Replies

boelboeltoday at 2:11 PM

I don't think everyone wants a meritocracy, I sure as hell don't want it. Having some sort of disability in a meritocracy would be even worse than now for example.

When people try to get to meritocracy it can also impose serious costs on society, both social and monetary cost. The imperial examination in China (which some would argue was the closest to a meritocracy) brought little advancement to China despite the fact that China was probably the wealthiest region until the 12-13th century. It did make the brightest/richest people study for years, sometimes decades of their life to produce little value after succeeding (except for themselves). You might argue that this isn't a meritocracy but I think we'll get similar behaviour no matter how you define 'merit'.