logoalt Hacker News

ricardobeattoday at 2:26 PM1 replyview on HN

So 3x more, plus the cost of a GPU (another 10k?). How is that value for money to get slightly better performance?


Replies

blintstoday at 2:38 PM

It can be more than "slightly", particularly if the model you're interested in (or will be interested in in 6 months) doesn't fit on the mac studio. You also need to account for eg storing 10TB of random checkpoints, load time when experimenting, and so on. When you start actually needing throughput these are all capability gaps in practical use, not just x% benchmark differences.

If you just want to run Qwen 3.8 27B and Deepseek v4 Flash in perpetuity and that's it, there are a lot of solutions that will work and this is a fairly user friendly one.

show 2 replies