alt Hacker NewsI'm not impressed with the article - boring and treats the book as an archeological study instead of attending to the immensity of the book's contents and predictions.
"Huxley" this, "Wells" that. Ugh! It is hard to make this book look boring but this article's author has done it.
Apologies in advance for the curmudgeonly tone.
I find this comment valuable because it sheds light on how impressive the book is to read in contrast to the subdued treatment in the article.