> If you're not even familiar with how LLMs work, perhaps you should restrain yourself from confidently talking about this topic until you educate yourself. You're only spreading misinformation.

I am very familiar with how LLMs work, and I am telling you that there is no consensus that they cannot achieve AGI in the machine learning community. Some people think so (such as Yann LeCun), others disagree. We just don't know yet.

> That for sure would be a very convenient definition, especially for all those AI labs trying to convince investors that they achieved AGI. Unfortunately everyone knows, that knowing the right answer isn't the same as knowing where that answer came from.

AGI is defined by capabilities, not methods.