interesting interpretation. most other articles on the topic have a different interpretation. if the AI can not be the author, then who can? is writing the prompt enough to establish being the creator? i think we need a few more cases to get an answer to that.
A company does NOT have rights to copy/mimic other works without legal license outside fair use like satire.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/future/article/20260414-the-monkey-sel...
The owner of the Camera in this case lost copyright ownership claim, as did the rights-group representing the monkey. =3
Clicking a button is enough to become an "author" of the photo, and writing a prompt requires more skill.