logoalt Hacker News

nonethewisertoday at 2:50 PM1 replyview on HN

Can you articulate this more? Are you saying the first amendment gives A/I a constitutional right not to be sanctioned?


Replies

mindslighttoday at 2:59 PM

Yes, we are talking about a communications service, one specifically focusing on political speech.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Email, chat, websites, blogs - these are all speech! A/I's overt political statement (that you are indicting them for) points to their primary interest being to facilitate political speech - a type of speech with some of the strongest protections (that whole "assemble ... and petition the Government" thing)

Beyond that, they're presumably a neutral conduit like every other service provider. If some users of their services are communicating to coordinate crimes, then unless A/I is getting directly involved in those conversations (with the government producing hard evidence of this), it's the exact same dynamic as every other email/hosting provider.

show 1 reply