logoalt Hacker News

bell-cottoday at 5:33 PM3 repliesview on HN

Not to cast a shadow over this effort, but it sounds like rural Alaska could use some well-planned gov't programs to reduce the basic cost of living for everyone.

Is anyone here familiar, to comment?


Replies

walrus01today at 7:09 PM

Alaska has generally two categories of places. Nome, mentioned in the URL, is a fly-in community that can receive barge shipments on the ocean during a short summer season. There is literally no road that goes there.

Not that cost of living is cheap in the rest of Alaska but the fly-in dependent communities are a whole other thing than the places that have a road ultimately connected to the Yukon, BC and the rest of continental north america by road.

The transport costs to get just about anything to the fly in communities is similar to Nunavut. Plenty of examples in Canadian media of $29 bottles of orange juice and similar.

rahimnathwanitoday at 7:59 PM

Or the people who don't like living in a remote area with high prices could choose to move somewhere else? The US is huge.

show 2 replies
klardotshtoday at 6:38 PM

The problem with doing that in Alaska is that there is not really a funding source for… anything. No income tax, typically little to no sales tax, low property taxes… the state’s other income source is a tax on the oil companies that drill and export from Alaska, which gets turned into the quasi-mini-UBI Public Fund Dividend.