logoalt Hacker News

nixpulvistoday at 3:42 PM3 repliesview on HN

The issue with AI is not its obvious value, it's our dependence on it. I worry what will happen to me when I am cut off for some reason.

Local models are going to be really important and hopefully computing costs don't make it too prohibitive.


Replies

swingandamisstoday at 3:47 PM

Hard agree. I've felt it already during outages or when I was traveling and didn't have internet on a flight, I couldn't function at the same level. I've been writing code for over 25 years, worked at the top big tech companies (still do) and it's remarkable how quickly I became dependent on AI.

show 1 reply
a2ff6eeb0today at 5:21 PM

If you're cut off for some reason, you won't code -- but if you're cut off from a power plant, you also won't code. We're reaching the end of scalability for human brains, so we're offloading it.

Sure, it means that selling intellectual labor is reaching the end of the line, and the value of learning will drop, but there's a lot more wealth that will be generated.

timcobbtoday at 4:13 PM

It's my understanding that this same debate raged when writing became a thing. Many viewed it with suspicious, or derision, as memorization was the big intellectual thing. So writing and reading back to remember was terrible. It's true it was a dependence, but the value was too high. With reading and writing a person could work on and synthesize from a far wider range of concurrent materials than one could with just memorization and recitation. Yeah, it's lame cheating, but writing enables a lot and so it won out.

show 2 replies