logoalt Hacker News

pzmarzlyyesterday at 4:23 PM6 repliesview on HN

> Personally, I think putting an interoperability protocol implementation behind a copyleft license is a little unfortunate!

Huh, haven't thought of it. Just relicensed ancs4linux to MIT.


Replies

voakbasdayesterday at 4:33 PM

I love HN. Read an article that raises a reasonable point about a project’s license, and that project’s author shows up to announce they were convinced and changed the license accordingly. Repo was updated 5 minutes ago.

It’s things like this that give me hope for the world.

show 2 replies
kees99yesterday at 4:27 PM

Isn't this[0] the use-case that is supposedly covered by LGPL?

[0] copyleft-licensed library that could be legally linked into non-copyleft code base.

show 1 reply
zackbyesterday at 8:52 PM

Thank you for all the hard work and inspiration.

nvr219yesterday at 10:02 PM

Hero

LeFantomeyesterday at 6:36 PM

Thank you!

Luker88yesterday at 7:50 PM

You might want to check again for something that has patent protection. apache2+llvm exception, or just the mozilla public license...

EUPL is also basically GPL without being viral, too.