I'm not sure how context is managed between reasoning traces and actual output in Claude / claude code, but if the reasoning trace is in the context of the question for "why did you do that", it can actually answer why it did that.
I may be mistaking, but I doubt it digs through thinking tokens of previous runs, not to mention previous sessions
Reasoning traces are also probable explanations.
I may be mistaking, but I doubt it digs through thinking tokens of previous runs, not to mention previous sessions