Yes, and when it isn't is a very specific very limited case that has no relation to the one being discussed.
The fact that some course of action was previously mentioned in a reasoning trace, or any other context, makes it more likely to be performed. It has nothing to do with the reason that it was mentioned in the reasoning trace.
I don't think it's that limited of a case.
And it's not "no relation", it was brought up as an attempt to fix/subset the original claim.