logoalt Hacker News

culiyesterday at 9:12 PM1 replyview on HN

It's only a tax on wealth above $50m. If she ever reaches that level of net worth, I highly doubt she'd have trouble paying a 2% tax on it.

The 1935 Revenue Tax was essentially a wealth tax and it brought great levels of prosperity as well as continued entrepreneurship


Replies

zahlmanyesterday at 9:28 PM

> If she ever reaches that level of net worth, I highly doubt she'd have trouble paying a 2% tax on it.

The point is that politicians (and political influencers) have a habit of proposing thresholds for taxation on rich people that manage to stay above their own personal level of wealth (or income). It comes across as self-serving.

The thresholds should have some actual calculation behind them that doesn't appear motivated by the speaker's personal situation.

show 1 reply