logoalt Hacker News

stephbooktoday at 1:08 PM7 repliesview on HN

Would be pretty stupid to spend all this energy erecting stones just for the view of it.

Like, it obviously had SOME purpose.


Replies

cogman10today at 1:27 PM

What's interesting is that it may have had multiple changing purposes during construction.

It took 1500 years to be established in its current form. It's pretty likely (to me at least) that the purpose of the year 1 work was different from year 1500.

malfisttoday at 1:20 PM

Yeah, why did they go through all that effort to build the Eiffel tower?

show 3 replies
dilawartoday at 1:31 PM

Or someone told them that folks in Egypt made a huge building out of stones. They started and gave up after a while. As good a story as any?

show 1 reply
repelsteeltjetoday at 2:16 PM

Sounds like the question Ylvis posed [1], years ago. :-)

[1] https://youtu.be/mbyzgeee2mg

bux93today at 1:51 PM

It was probably a tribe that later emigrated to Australia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_things_(Australia)

spicyusernametoday at 1:49 PM

My favorite theory is that nomadic civilizations during that period were known to congregate together temporarily throughout the year.

Stonehenge was one of the places they would do this.

Makes sense to make the meeting spot nice.

alephnerdtoday at 1:40 PM

> Would be pretty stupid to spend all this energy erecting stones just for the view of it

I think the same way looking at medieval cathedrals or Roman and Greek era theatres, collesiums, and agoras...

At least the Ottomans used the Parthenon as an arms depot, giving those stones some meaning.

(This is sarcasm)

show 2 replies