> to this day, there are no physical observations which contradict Zuse's notion, as he wrote it, of a computable universe.
This was the claim, and OP has a point, which you are misinterpreting as religion vs physics.
The person I replied to compared religion with physics (god vs deterministic computable universe). I said those are not remotely equally defensible theories.
The person I replied to compared religion with physics (god vs deterministic computable universe). I said those are not remotely equally defensible theories.