logoalt Hacker News

GPU World

91 pointsby simonpuretoday at 3:16 AM27 commentsview on HN

Comments

mkageniustoday at 6:32 AM

> LLM use is permitted, but discouraged; we remind participants that LLM use tends to reduce originality and writing quality, and the flaws are especially obvious when LLM outputs are read as a group---unskillful use of LLMs will reduce the odds of being the best entry. We request disclosure of AI use.

Lot of submissions won't disclose it. Wouldn't it better to run your own checker instead of asking to disclose (to be fair to everyone).. I suppose there ought to be some checker which is SOTA.

If you anyway intend to use the checker then kindly do no ask to disclose it, coz what's the point then.

NitpickLawyertoday at 5:59 AM

I just finished reading Service Model by Adrian Tchaikovsky [1], a really timely novel that deals with lots of open ended questions of AI, robots, humanity, control, self determination, and so on. Really recommend it if you're into these kinds of things.

> Premise Imagine that AI frontier progress stops as of 1 September 2026: AI becomes faster and cheaper, but it never becomes superhuman or improves considerably across the board.

I absolutely love this premise. I wrote a comment a few days ago about this very thing. I've had this "revelation" in early 2024, when using a small local model, that even if models never improve, I'd still have a few years of discovering all the things I could do with the models.

Really cool, hopefully we get some interesting and not overwhelmingly pessimistic stories out of this project. There's enough cynicism and negativity in the world. We could use some funny takes on everyone using openclaw2040 ran by fable. Shenanigans galore.

[1] - https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/195790861-service-mod...

show 1 reply
rixedtoday at 6:02 AM

Since the dawn of industry, people have been amazed by the new possibilities and how that would affect society once it's evenly distributed. Technical progress has been going on, percolating in every places and down to every person. Yet it's never been "evenly distributed".

What would happen when every one would have access to Internet? How different will the world be when everyone carries a computer in their pocket? Can communicate with anyone regardless of location and language, with no intermediary? Those were questions we used to ask ourselves not so long ago. Turned out: not much have changed.

For the future to be evenly distributed, much bigger changes will have to happen than large scale manufacture of efficient GPUs. Otherwise, tech will just be used to make sure progress and knowledge stays unevently distributed. That's the whole game of herding humans, after all; It's called "organized scarcity".

show 2 replies
not2btoday at 5:49 AM

Hopefully in this world, someone figures out how to deliver the performance equivalent of a B300 GPU for about 1/100th the power of a current B300 (which can be up to 1400 watts), or the world will bake.

show 1 reply
XCSmetoday at 6:14 AM

We can't even predict/understand our current world, yet alone the world in 20 years.

Even if we get to one GPU pe person, it's not like that's the end state, the world constantly changes and will constantly evolve. If it stagnates too long, people get bored and a revolution would happen.

So, whatever that world would be, it would be temporary too

show 1 reply
jdubtoday at 5:37 AM

LLM use is permitted, but discouraged; [...] We request disclosure of AI use.

Heh. In the future I imagine, this would be embarrassingly redundant. "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind."

show 1 reply
divbzerotoday at 6:00 AM

Quite an interesting selection committee:

  Neal Stephenson
  Gwern Branwen
  Matt Huang
newyankeetoday at 6:06 AM

there might be 8 billion GPUs in the world by 2040 but they will be controlled by 8 corporations across the world.

show 1 reply
GalaxyNovatoday at 6:14 AM

What will happen when everyone has access to a hot air balloon?

padolseytoday at 5:48 AM

We humans will all be but API conduits for our respective AIs.

show 1 reply
peter_d_shermantoday at 5:41 AM

>"Someday, such as in 2040, there may be available, for every human being, the performance equivalent of 'a B300 GPU for contemporary LLMs'.

What would this world be like?

What will our world be like when (not if) every human being has access to the equivalent of a Fable or Sol LLM 24/7/365? Will this lead to a panopticon of indefatigable AI surveillance? Will education be revolutionized by infinitely patient tutors? Will social media cease to exist as we know it? Will healthcare be revolutionized by world class AI doctors and personalized medicines? What will happen in the oft-ignored developing world?"

What great questions!

These would be great questions to pose to a Creative Writing class, any Creative Writing class!

Or heck, any Creative Writing class, Philosophy class, or Futurist!

You know, there should be a web page, a time-capsule web page if you will, where people of 2026 ask questions about what specific future years will look like in terms of health, climate, politics, religion, currency, geopolitics, social media, news, education, etc., etc., and then all of these questions could be aggregated statistically into the most asked ones, and that could be preserved going forward in time...

That's from a looking-forward-into-the-future perspective...

We could, from a looking-backwards-into-the-past perspective, try to discover what people, in say 1900, thought about the future; what their specific concerns were, what their specific questions were... perhaps some historian or historians or books or (copied to) web pages out there contains some of this information somewhere...

Which might be interesting to look at for comparison purposes...

You know, "for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only...", to quote Charles Dickens' 1859 book, "A Tale Of Two Cities"... :-)

show 1 reply
tucnaktoday at 5:18 AM

Neal Stephenson is one of the judges. 40k seems like generous enough first prize. I wonder if they will accept a play.

show 2 replies