logoalt Hacker News

dataflowtoday at 12:03 PM1 replyview on HN

> On what planet do you think anyone other than the most dedicated of dedicated people would choose the shop that requires waiting a whole day to use it when the alternative has no such restriction?

I have no clue what you're referring to or worried about here, could you clarify? Are you worried Android is going to lose power users to iPhone? What are the alternative shops you're referring to here? We're not buying pastries.

> The developers in F-Droid are verified, just not by Google.

"Unverified" in my comment was a shorthand for "unverified by Google", not an insult.

> Google is not the be-all and end-all, but with this power-play, they are making themselves that.

The complain about that? Rather than wasting time complaining about the 24h wait?

I don't know if people's imaginations are lacking here, but there could easily be a world in which your 'alternative' verifier would still make you wait 24h (or longer). The wait is clearly a security mechanism, regardless of who makes you do it. (And yes, it could have been chosen for plausible deniability.) Is your actual problem the wait itself, or is your actual problem the identity of the entity making you do it, or is your actual problem that the power is too concentrated in one entity, regardless of the entity? These are very different issues with very different solutions.


Replies

Ajedi32today at 1:47 PM

> What are the alternative shops you're referring to here?

In this analogy, the alternative shop that is preventing you from buying stuff from its competitors without a 24 hour wait is the Play Store monopoly.

> but there could easily be a world in which your 'alternative' verifier would still make you wait 24h (or longer).

Then in this hypothetical world where there were a free market for verifiers rather than a single, monopolistic choice, I would choose another alternative verifier that doesn't make me wait 24 hours, or no verifier at all.