logoalt Hacker News

marcianxtoday at 1:54 PM2 repliesview on HN

I'm genuinely curious: I read through the article and the narrative felt deliberate and didn't trigger my AI-radar. What made you think it was AI written?


Replies

zbentleytoday at 3:06 PM

It’s rife with “and that’s the important thing. $thing”-type constructions. Human writing uses those much more sparingly and doesn’t separate them into two sentences as often. It has a lot of “subject change: teaser” constructions, too. And overuse of bold and restatement.

Could it be human? Sure. But it doesn’t seem likely to me.

anon48293today at 2:03 PM

It didn’t read AI generated to me. I also love the irony of then using AI to generate a summary

show 1 reply