alt Hacker News> This article is the story of chasing that number down to a single machine instruction, and then finding out that the instruction was only half of the answer.
> So the difference has to be in what the JIT generated, and the profiler gives us exactly that.
> That is the whole vocabulary. Let’s read some code.
> Decoding the x86 version instruction by instruction is out of scope here.
> What is not architecture specific is the logic.
Here’s a segment flagged by Pangram: https://www.pangram.com/history/87e25169-30a4-4030-a65a-dba8...
Replies
I don't think the Pangram result is shareable to others.
"If you are sure the link is correct, please make sure you are logged in with the account associated with this result."
Even if that were AI (and I think there are better examples in the article to indicate that it is), why do you care if you just used AI anyway to summarize it anyway?
[dead]
I don't know if it's AI or not, but if it is, it isn't egregious, and certainly not "garbage" or disrespectful to the reader.