alt Hacker NewsI love my eInk displays, I love my bike head unit.
But I don't see how they both fit together honestly.
The pros of eInk:
- low energy usage -> don't matter, current GPS units have +30 hours of battery life already
- low eye strain -> don't matter, you don't look at the screen for hours at a time
- visibility -> don't matter, current GPS units adapt to ambient light
- angle visibility -> don't matter, the screen is right in front of you
The cons of eInk:
- refresh rate -> yeah, I don't want the map display to be laggy
- visibility in the dark -> tunnels, tree cover... I don't want to my GPS to be invisible
- lack of color -> colors provide lots of information on the map display
Replies
schiffern • today at 7:55 PM
>don't matter... don't matter... don't matter...
For others, some of those advantages do matter. Different strokes for different folks! Cheers mate.
flutas • today at 7:11 PM
IMO at least a better one to do would be a transflective LCD like the original pebble watches used.
➕ show 3 replies
jms703 • today at 9:14 PM
Well said. I don't understand who this would be for.
30minAdayHN • today at 7:08 PM
I agree. But this could be a fun and cheap project to do with kids for their bikes :)
This device has a backlight enabled by a physical button, and navi refresh rate doesn't matter because you're riding and not staring at it. 1Hz is fine for a reference.
Not sure why needing less battery or having better at-a-glance visibility would be such a bad thing.
One need not love a device, that's ok. But digging to invent a reason to hate it also doesn't seem necessary.