Someone asked:

> What really important things are human reviews catching in your org?

Another person said:

> 1. Whether the thing should be done in the first place

And you replied:

> All of these are angles an AI reviewer can test for as well, and will (IME) mostly catch mistakes correctly

Which as I noted, is very far from the truth. I neither claimed that you said "agent reviews are a panacea", but when you claim "AI can solve all those things" and two of the first items cannot be addressed by AI (today), then I'm rebuking those specific things, not some other general point you implicitly made.