It's the tried and true headline method of "event 2 happened after event 1", implying a causal effect between the two, despite no evidence of such effect existing. Technically the headline is correct, in the same way that "Canada Tariffs $20b in US Goods After Amazon Plane Crash" is also correct.
David Hume would argue that the causal effect is never seen between 2 events so what's the difference?
LibreOffice breaks download records after Trump renames Lake Ontario to Lake America
David Hume reads the news
It is actually no correct. A record by definition is an unsurpassed accomplishment or statistic. It needs to be an accomplishment before it can be called a record. The passage of time does not qualify as a record. Also, a statistical certainty cannot be called a record.
"it's our most powerful X ever" - every Apple event ever