alt Hacker NewsDoes seem like they gloss over Alpöge and Buckmaster's work with the following
> While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models .
Which seems a bit irresponsible/rash?
Replies
jsw97 • today at 5:57 PM
Would that be more or less unlikely than accidentally hacking another company? More or less unlikely than colonizing an obscure wiki?
Highly persistent agents + vibe-coded security seems like a problem.
suddenlybananas • today at 5:30 PM
They'll probably claim a rogue AI agent accessed it accidentally!
viccis • today at 5:32 PM
"Unlikely" lmao if it's in the corpus, it's gonna be brought up immediately.
This is no different than scooping them.
➕ show 2 replies
What else can they declare really? Yeah the model has training data from previous attempts. Alpöge and Buckmaster also similarly benefited from attempts before theirs.