logoalt Hacker News

Growing proof that autonomous cars save lives

57 pointsby bookofjoetoday at 5:14 PM89 commentsview on HN

Comments

n0ustoday at 5:30 PM

Growing proof that PR for autonomous car companies has aligned on a strategy of painting you as a bad person if you want to drive your own car, and therefore you should pay them money to continue being a good person.

show 13 replies
Junk_Collectortoday at 5:26 PM

It could, but maybe not if your motto is, "Move Fast and Break Things."

Article is short on data instead referencing a bunch of aggregated IIHS studies.

show 2 replies
dlisboatoday at 5:23 PM

ADAS + human driver seems enough to solve most of the shortcomings of both human and robot drivers.

Full self-driving doesn't strike me as necessary to prevent deaths.

show 5 replies
32ahgftoday at 5:36 PM

So can 100% public transport, non-autonomous. But there is less lobbying money for award winning journalists.

fierycatnettoday at 5:45 PM

I have a feeling that once everything goes EV and autopilot, they will start phasing out regular cars or will make it more difficult to obtain the license.

show 1 reply
dghlsakjgtoday at 5:32 PM

Is there a standard that these cars have to meet?

Really there should be an obstacle course of some kind based on the most common anomalies leading to accidents. Partially obscured road signs, worn paint markings, obscured sight lines caused by dense parking, driving on a snowed over surface, etc.

show 4 replies
danieldevriestoday at 5:37 PM

Of course. This seems so obvious.

More sensors with 360 degrees. Faster reaction time. Constantly improving, be it from real world data or from a simulated environment. Zero fatigue. No emotion evolved. No drugs are alcohol in the system.

Fyi. Long robotaxis.

ks2048today at 6:03 PM

In the modern USA, "saving lives" is anti-correlated with policy, so let's see how this plays out.

raincoletoday at 5:40 PM

Isn't it... quite a well known thing?

show 1 reply
WalterBrighttoday at 5:52 PM

I'll be sad when I'm forced to give up driving my old cars.

BoingBoomTschaktoday at 6:13 PM

The article sensibly asks if the (intentionally or not) cherry-picked stats about automated driving (fair weather only, limited to specific areas that aren't especially difficult) is valid then cites a study that really massages those stats in a dubious way (e.g. only counts as a crash if the airbag triggered, no mention of weather). Hmmm...

Another thing I'd really like to know: let's suppose that these are indeed safer than the average driver. Is it also the case for the median driver?

watwuttoday at 5:41 PM

I was reading about autonomous cars being better then people 6 years ago ... along with cries about the cars are treated unfairly.

dontsubmittoday at 7:21 PM

[dead]

EarthBluestoday at 6:21 PM

[dead]

josefritzisheretoday at 5:21 PM

[flagged]

show 1 reply