logoalt Hacker News

tescrealyesterday at 6:00 PM3 repliesview on HN

I see a lot of Self-driving cars hitting people vs. reckless drivers hitting people.

What I want is simple: accountability. If a human hits a human, we throw the book at them in the case of a modality of negligence. If a robot screws up, how do we remedy and discourage?


Replies

femtotoday at 6:12 AM

It should be 100% liability on the self-driving car. Only by doing that will there be enough incentive for the manufacturers to drive the accident rate down to zero (or in practice a low enough number that the cost to manufacturer of the remaining accidents is negligible). Less than 100% liability provides wiggle room, which car manufacturers will exploit to maximise profits over lives. With 100% liability manufacturers can still make a pile of money, but only if they have a low accident rate.

hiddencosttoday at 3:19 AM

Point of fact: we do not treat vehicular homicide seriously in the American legal system.

margalabargalatoday at 3:00 AM

Hold the manufacturer equally liable. Easy.

show 1 reply