logoalt Hacker News

gentleraintoday at 1:42 PM5 repliesview on HN

So people genuinely believe that toggling that "Improve the model for everyone" button makes their data safe from being used for training?

How do people become that trusting?

The phrasing itself is guilt tripping


Replies

quentindanjoutoday at 1:51 PM

We are asking people to become experts in all domains rather than providing a safe context through regulations and laws. I don't like thinking the issue is people, I am a person myself, and I often do mistakes on things I don't want to be an expert at but I do believe I should be in a safe context and not have to worry about every single thing.

Or at least: tell me I should be careful/worry about those particular things.

show 2 replies
beeringtoday at 2:42 PM

Literally every famous open math problem has had >1 mathematicians ask ChatGPT to solve it. Probably greater than >1000 if you count randos. There is no math problem that OpenAI/Anthropic can solve that didn’t have users already try it in Chat/Claude.

show 1 reply
speak_plainlytoday at 1:53 PM

Coincidentally, a tweet from OpenAI's Tibo yesterday:

https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2097746417012166816

DrewADesigntoday at 2:04 PM

Personally, I wouldn’t assume it was lying. To me, dark patterns (like manipulative wording) imply that:

1) someone in a governing body, or someone in the organization, e.g a designer, ethicist, lawyer, developer, etc. has successfully argued that users should be able to avoid something that they determine is not in their best interest.

And also:

2) someone in the c-suite or marketing has decided to mitigate that through some dark pattern.

If they never intended to give the user that control, they’d probably just not give the user the control in the first place. Giving them the option and not honoring it would either imply they were that incompetent or careless with fate protection, which seems most likely if this is all true, or an even more cynical approach to tricking users into thinking it’s not used for training to get them to share better shit. But if that was the case, why bother with the sleazy dark pattern? That seems a little cartoon villain-y to me. I suppose the in-between option would be that they decided at some point they were no longer willing to honor it and didn’t want to deal with the inevitable PR shitstorm of removing it. I could definitely see that happening in this industry, these days.

show 2 replies
enraged_cameltoday at 2:29 PM

There's also the fact that the setting has been getting turned on by some users: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49643556

show 1 reply