logoalt Hacker News

adverblyyesterday at 10:56 PM1 replyview on HN

Can you also attest to the scaling factor they suggest and that it doesn't have any scaling time benefits?

166 * 40 = 7000ish

They say it is 20x that.

Do you also agree with that?


Replies

MarkusQyesterday at 11:14 PM

The point was that a textbook (where the 40hr/page estimate comes from) is cumulative/linear -- what you need for page n was defined / established on the preceding pages. But in a proof such as this you can call on any other published result (and those can do the same) so the dependency graph is (potentially) much bushier. Thus later pages of the proof should take far more than 40 hours to manually formalize.