logoalt Hacker News

diggernettoday at 1:02 AM5 repliesview on HN

Oh good. Then Google will be "clean", while countless homes will be getting their power from coal or whatever instead of this nuclear plant.


Replies

jryle70today at 1:16 AM

The plant may be closed without this Google's order. The cost to keep it running is substantial. I guess that's what you prefer?

"The Finland deal will ensure that the Loviisa plant keeps operating beyond 2030, the companies said in a statement. Keeping it running until 2050 will require about €1 billion of investments over the years"

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-09-09/google-gi...

show 1 reply
pembrooktoday at 2:14 AM

Finland doesn't get the rest of its power from coal, they're one of the greenest energy markets on the planet.

echelontoday at 1:06 AM

It's a market. Why can't someone buy it?

Why does it matter that homes "aren't clean" while Google is? That's silly. There's going to be the same level of demand no matter what - the same mix of coal and nuclear inputs will happen regardless of where the outflows are. It's fungible.

More demand will in time result in an increase in supply. That's a good thing. We'll be building a lot more, and it's long overdue.

johnnyApplePRNGtoday at 1:08 AM

Yes let's shame corporations for spending money on and supporting things that need more support. /s