This is my first time hearing about RTK, and yikes! The benchmarks mean nothing; this thing is actively dangerous to use.

If my agent runs a shell command, show my agent the output of that shell command. I don't have a problem with automatically pruning or paginating large outputs, as long as the agent still has some form of access to the original output (e.g., by searching).

But removing verbosity from an 'ls' command? That's ridiculous! If my agent runs `ls -la`, do not drop the owner and date from the output, because THAT'S AN EXPECTED PART OF THE OUTPUT. Nothing should be trying to predict the agent's intent and interfering, unless you want your agent to get confused and fail.

These LLMs were trained on predictable shell behavior, and RTK deliberately subverts the model's expectations. There's no way that isn't degrading the model's capability.