logoalt Hacker News

consumer451today at 12:38 AM1 replyview on HN

Oh, thanks for the new to me info, I genuinely did not know this. Any idea why, and who replaced him?

It may be for regulatory reasons? Still, he is the "advisor."

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-ai-czar-sacks-s...


Replies

apetresctoday at 1:56 AM

“Moves to advisory role” is just corporate speak for “retired/fired”. I can’t think of a single example of an executive who “moved to an advisory role” and demonstrated even an iota of influence after that point.

show 1 reply