logoalt Hacker News

oceanskytoday at 12:49 AM6 repliesview on HN

Also, why there's no accountability?

Even if there's no intent, it's still a cyber attack.


Replies

alexfortintoday at 1:27 AM

Exactly. Think what would happen if it was a Chinese LLM company behind such an attack...

root_axistoday at 1:37 AM

Who could possibly hold them accountable?

show 2 replies
cameldrvtoday at 1:00 AM

It’s interesting that a lot of U.S. law requires intent. If you just give AI your objective without specifying the means, and the AI violates a bunch of laws requiring intent, but neither the AI nor the person can be prosecuted, this is very convenient.

show 9 replies
scotty79today at 1:05 AM

We have a word for attack with no intent. It's accident.

show 3 replies
matthewdgreentoday at 12:54 AM

Because right now the Department of Justice is shut down for causes that the administration supports, which includes OpenAI, and none of the victims want to sue over it.

show 1 reply
grueztoday at 12:57 AM

No harm, no foul. Dog owners are on the hook for damages resulting from their dogs, but there must be some damage in the first place. If the dog gets loose and goes in your fenced backyard, disregarding your "no trespassing" sign, you can't punish the dog owner just because. Hacking into a server is closer to the latter. At best rubygems can claim some cleanup costs.

show 4 replies