> we use “malicious” to describe code that goes out of its way to trick or mislead the user, exploit bugs or compromise the system. This includes un-reviewed AI-generated proofs and programs.
It is interesting that AI-generated proofs are described as malicious by Lean docs unless reviewed.
It's a simple binary classification. AI-generated proofs can't be "honest", and the only other possibility is "malicious".
LLM's have generated "False" proofs in Lean, so that statement is not far off. Malicious or incompetent? Take your pick.