> Peer in peer-reviewed is a logical coherent and functional definition with answers.
What is the definition? If you tell me that, then I might be able to tell you if it is logical coherent and functional, I have a PhD in computational logic.
Amongst all this rhetorical brush-beating, what were you trying to teach the snakes?
> I have a PhD in computational logic.
And you don't know how the peer-review system works?
Just a hunch but Claude saying your work is "PhD level" does not count
Your (many) replies on this topic are being down voted for a reason; please either post substantive comments or stop.
Something like this sketch work for you?
peer(X, 0) :- founding_peer(X).
electorate(T, count<Y>) :- peer(Y, T).
support(X, T, count<Y>) :- candidate(X), peer(Y, T), recognizes(Y, X, T+1).
peer(X, T+1) :- support(X, T, Votes), electorate(T, Total), 2 * Votes > Total.